As enterprises embrace agentic AI and remote work, traditional security approaches are reaching a breaking point. In 2025, organizations face a growing Access-Trust Gap—the disconnect between how widely access is granted and how little trust or control supports it. This gap is being widened not just by shadow IT, but by agentic AI, which is now entering workplaces with game-changing speed and complexity.
The Rise of Agentic AI and the Access-Trust Crisis
The Access-Trust Gap refers to the growing risk created when devices, applications, and AI agents access corporate data without adequate governance. In an era where users frequently rely on personal devices and unsanctioned SaaS apps to stay productive, traditional identity and access management (IAM) tools are struggling to keep up.
Now, agentic AI tools, autonomous systems that act, decide, and move data across applications, are accelerating this crisis. These AI agents need broad, persistent access across systems, but behave in unpredictable and opaque ways. Unlike human users, they often bypass basic controls like multi-factor authentication (MFA), raising significant security red flags.
Why the “Rule of No” Doesn’t Work Anymore
Historically, security teams operated under a restrictive “rule of no” philosophy—blocking apps, devices, or actions that weren’t approved. But this mindset is no longer sustainable. Employees, like rebels in Star Wars, are determined to use the tools that make them productive, even if that means sidestepping security policies.
Trying to prevent the use of shadow IT or agentic AI altogether is not only unrealistic—it pushes risky behavior further into the dark. Instead of fighting user behavior, organizations must shift to a user-centric AI security strategy that focuses on enabling secure experimentation and innovation.
A “Rule of Yes” Approach to Secure AI and Shadow IT
To effectively bridge the Access-Trust Gap, enterprises must shift from a restrictive “rule of no” to a flexible yet controlled “rule of yes” approach. This means reimagining security to enable, rather than block, productivity tools while maintaining robust governance. Organizations should enforce compliance checks on personal devices, require strong authentication and audit trails for SaaS usage, and grant AI agents role-specific access with revocation options and comprehensive logging.
Crucially, human oversight must remain in place to ensure accountability in AI-driven actions. This proactive model allows security teams to manage shadow IT and agentic AI responsibly, bringing them into the light without compromising control.
It’s Time to Rethink Trust and Control
AI agents are here, and with them comes an urgent need to modernize enterprise access controls. The Access-Trust Gap can no longer be ignored, especially as AI decision-making accelerates. The path forward isn’t about locking down systems; it’s about intelligent enablement.
By adopting a “rule of yes” security strategy, organizations can support productivity, innovation, and agility—without compromising safety. And maybe, just maybe, security teams will finally be seen not as the villains, but as the heroes of the story.
About The Author
