On July 21, 2025, Donald Trump tweeted a video of AI arresting and jailing Barack Obama. The video, with handcuffed Obama dressed up as a prisoner, corresponds to the recent allegations by Tulsi Gabbard concerning the wrongdoings in the Obama administration. This has been an indicator of an increasing application of AI in political messages and propaganda. It borders on satire and misinformation, becoming the source of both outrage and support. Synthetic media in politics raises concerns about imminent ethical, regulatory, and factual matters. The implication provided by the video is that AI is partially influencing the development of political discourse construction and reception.
Context Behind the Video and Its Political Timing
The video of Trump generated with the help of AI has been released after a politically charged development. Only three days ago, Tulsi Gabbard went on the record to accuse the Obama administration of just such a treasonous plot by manipulating intelligence to connect Trump to Russian electoral interference in 2016. Gabbard, who is a current Director of National Intelligence, says in newly declassified documents that there are indications that the intelligence in support of Trump declined immediately after his victory and shifted to supporting an undermining narrative.
These accusations renewed partisan spirit and raised new particular criticism against Obama’s policies. It seems that Trump uses the video, in which he arrests Obama and sends him to jail, as a way to symbolically respond to these accusations. It employs the visions created with the help of AI to depict the concept of accountability and retribution that further enhances political polarization.
The posting of the video was not a unique case of satire. It is an intentional attempt at trying to take advantage of current headlines, boost a political message, and also elicit an emotional response. The cartoon treatment shows Obama being arrested according to a fictional scenario through the tune of the song Jailhouse Rock, with the caption NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, indicating that Trump is trying to seal the message that even ex-presidents should face the law if they break it.
AI Deepfakes and the Erosion of Public Trust in Media
This incident demonstrates one of the developing problems: the AI media’s use of political rhetoric. The emotional provocation and the greater reality of deepfakes, such as the video of the arrest of Obama, have prompted fears of manipulation and misinformation. Political actors can now visually communicate something that they had to carefully articulate in words before or something that they had to cover in legal ambiguity. Such media might constitute political expression or satire, but their emotional lifelikeness may confuse the public, distort reality, and create tension.
The mechanisms of regulating this content, in this case, are minimal. Since the video does not purport to be of a true event, it might not be liable for defamation. Yet, it can change the minds of people. That is the danger: the viewers may reinterpret such depictions as some symbolic truths or a pointer to the plan of the future. This means that it will be more difficult to differentiate between truth and falsehood as far as deepfakes are concerned. Particularly among those people who are not yet sure of whom to vote for, or those who are not concerned about politics.
AI Imagery Marks a New Phase in Political Combat
AI produced the video, which depicted a fictional arrest of Obama, marking a detrimental change in the manner in which concepts in politics are conveyed. It depicts the strength and controversy of synthetic media in the hands of political interests. Dramatization of legal responsibility with AI allowed Trump to avoid antiquated rhetoric and appeal directly to the feelings of viewers. Some might term this as a satire, whilst others believe that it is manipulative and irresponsible.
About The Author
